CasinoCityTimes.com

Gurus
News
Newsletter
Author Home Author Archives Author Books Search Articles Subscribe
Newsletter Signup
Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter!
Newsletter Signup
Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter!
Mark Pilarski Archives
More Strategy Experts

Gaming Guru

author's picture
 

Deal Me In: Appearances can be deceiving

17 April 2015

By Mark Pilarski
Dear Mark: I have been a long time, 20-year reader of your column. Your weekly column offers terrific material for us aspiring gamblers. I do strictly abide by your “make only bets that have less than a 2% house rule” with one exception. As you advise, I am always on the lookout for a single-zero roulette table where the house edge is cut in half. Where I usually play, the single-zero roulette wheel made its exit long ago; but just recently, I found a single-zero roulette video machine. As far as I can tell, the layout looks the same. Are the odds the same on this video version as that of a single-zero table game? Brad H.

Thank you, Brad, for your kind words, and certainly for being a loyal reader. As for my Deal Me In column, it started in April of 1996, so I am a year shy of that 20-year milestone.

As you stated, Brad, under normal playing conditions, a single-zero roulette table lowers the house edge to 2.7 percent in contrast to 5.26 percent found on double-zero games. Electronic versions of table games tend to have a variety of different paytables. I noticed that at a local casino where I live in N. Michigan, their single-zero machine only pays 33-for-1 on a straight-up wager versus 35-to-1. For starters, even the astute player had better notice the "for-1" and "to-1" alteration.

At 33-for-1, the machine keeps your original one-unit wager, and you receive only 33 units in winnings. Typically on a single-zero roulette table, you are paid 35-to-1, which is not only 35 units in winnings but you get to keep your initial one unit bet. With that 33 “for” 1 payoff, the house edge skyrockets to 10.8 percent.

By getting only 33 total units on a single-zero video machine, the “yippee” of your initial find will rapidly turn into a “yikes” as your bankroll quickly disappears.

Dear Mark: I have been playing video poker since its beginnings, recording to date well over 100 royal flushes. This weekend, I hit two consecutive Royals in a row, which was a first for me. What are the odds of this happening? I was playing on a 10-7 Double Bonus Poker game. Dave R.

Your video poker gaming timeline, Dave, must have begun in 1979, as that is when Si Redd, by combining a solid-state processing unit with a TV-like monitor, introduced Draw Poker.

I am partial to your game of choice, Dave, as a 10/7 (10 for a full house and 7 for a flush) "Double Bonus" machine not only offers a bonus payout for four aces, but this variation of video poker has a theoretical return of 100.2 percent when played with perfect strategy.

The frequency of Royal flushes depends on your playing expertise. If you are employing optimal play on a 10-7 Double Bonus Poker game, you will average, theoretically, a Royal every 48,048 hands.

Going all the way back to the game’s inception, back-to-back Royals is an event that the vast majority of video poker players have never witnessed and never will. With your example, you just multiply 48,048 X 48,048 and the odds of hitting back-to-back Royals are 2,308,610,304 to one. After your first, though, the Royal after that has the same one in 48,048 chance of hitting.

Gambling Wisdom of the Week: “I don't eat peanuts at the card table. There's no reason in the world eating peanuts should affect the outcome of the game, but it doesn't cost me anything to observe the taboo against it, so I observe it.” – Doyle Brunson, How I Made $1,000,000 Playing Poker (1979)
 

Deal Me In: Using this lotto write-off ruse is ill advised

10 April 2015
Dear Mark: I have a tax liability from a slot jackpot win from this past November of $20,000. Because I have never won any sizable amount in the past, I didn’t do what you have suggested multiple times, that is, keep accurate records of my play. All I have is the tax form from the casino and no documented losses to offset that win. ... (read more)
 

Deal Me In: I'll be back

3 April 2015
Dear Mark: Recently, someone who wrote you was frustrated with never winning at slots. Your answer was excellent but you left something out that is probably also adding to his frustration: gamblers, especially slot players in my opinion, are notorious liars about their gambling outcomes. Although the ... (read more)
 

Deal Me In: Only Nostradamus can predict when a machine is due to hit

27 March 2015
Dear Mark: I always look forward to reading your answers and thoughts on the casino world. I do have one question that I have always wanted to ask and your recent answer to the fellow complaining that he always loses at the slots has stimulate me to ask. You mentioned that a slot machine might be programmed to return 88% of the wagered money back in wins. ... (read more)

Next 10 Articles >

  • Featured Articles

Deal Me In: Your chances of busting are not as great as you think

Dear Mark: Your reference to splitting 10s in the last round of a tournament reminds me of my favorite casino story: Dice isn’t my game (I have only one game—21) but once I stopped by a dice table to witness the last roll in a tournament. One player, who was in the middle of the pack and not likely to win anything, put all his money on the boxcars prop bet. ... (read more)
 

Deal Me In: Gimmick bets are part of the game

Dear Mark: With “Fortune” Pai Gow Poker, how bad are the odds on the bonus fortune bet? Ray C.Pai Gow Poker is a hybrid of Chinese dominos, “Pai Gow” and American seven-card poker. Played with a standard 52-card deck plus a joker, it differs from the typical seven-card game in that you play against a banker, ... (read more)
 

Deal Me In: Possible, but improbable of hitting the big kahuna

Dear Mark: I just returned from Las Vegas and noticed every casino offers banks of slot machines that offer those huge progressive jackpots. Do those machines ever pay the progressive jackpot or is that the casino's way of getting people to pump in more of their money? Gary C.The allure of progressive ... (read more)
 

Deal Me In: Times to split 10s at blackjack are extremely rare

Dear Mark: I am aware that you never – ever – ever split 10s against a dealer’s 5 or 6. However, I have been tempted to do so when no one else is at the Blackjack table. My question is what is the percentage odds of winning (or losing) by doing so? Herb C.Surprisingly, Herb, there was a gaming writer, John ... (read more)
 

Deal Me In: Player questions if he is a freak of nature

Dear Mark: I am a freak of nature. Of the 50 times that I have played slots, maybe twice I left with $20 to $40. All the other times I have lost big. One time, I went with a lucky elderly teacher friend of mine and she won $300. I lost $50. So, she gave me another 20, and again I lost. She then gave me yet another 20, and again I lost. ... (read more)
Mark Pilarski
As a recognized authority on casino gambling, Mark Pilarski survived 18 years in the casino trenches, working for seven different casinos. Mark now writes a nationally syndicated gambling column, is a university lecturer, author, reviewer and contributing editor for numerous gaming periodicals, and is the creator of the best-selling, award-winning audiocassette series on casino gambling, Hooked on Winning.
Mark Pilarski
As a recognized authority on casino gambling, Mark Pilarski survived 18 years in the casino trenches, working for seven different casinos. Mark now writes a nationally syndicated gambling column, is a university lecturer, author, reviewer and contributing editor for numerous gaming periodicals, and is the creator of the best-selling, award-winning audiocassette series on casino gambling, Hooked on Winning.